Now and then, the gaunt Gannett zombie ceases its mindless mumbling of press releases and wire reports and speaks with a coherent voice of its own. This is one of those cases. Looks like Lansing is flirting with the idea of kicking that car habit, and not a moment too soon.
The only thing that disappoints us is the headline. Light rail in and of itself will not make greater Lansing "exciting," and it may or may not attract spoiled millennials--er, young professionals. What matters is that it brings us back to the future, saves tremendous amounts of energy, reduces the drain on our nonrenewable oil reserves, and gives us one more option besides the four-ton personal exoskeleton.
But kudos anyway.
---------------------
Light-rail system considered for city
Advocates see idea as a way to attract young professionals
Scott Davis • sedavis@lsj.com • February 26, 2009 • From Lansing State Journal
Lansing's electric streetcars once spanned the city and beyond in the early part of the 20th century, connecting it with St. Johns and Mason.
Advertisement
That romance with rail died in the 1930s with the rise of automobiles and quieter gas-powered buses, but tri-county leaders once again are contemplating whether they should seek funding for a new light-rail system to put the Lansing area back on track.
Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero said the concept could make the city more attractive as a workplace for young professionals and push the city to the forefront of the green energy movement.
"The kids want to live in a city that's green and clean," he said.
The idea emerged last week during a meeting of a newly formed regional task force, Task Force Tomorrow, when tri-county leaders were brainstorming potential regional ideas for use of federal stimulus money.
In one incarnation, the concept would involve electric rail cars between Lansing, East Lansing and possibly other nearby communities; it would not replace the Capital Area Transportation Authority bus system, but would supplement it.
While some leaders say that using stimulus funds for a light-rail system is unrealistic because it likely would require years of study, East Lansing City Manager Ted Staton said he hopes the area could be eligible for funding to study the idea under a federal transportation bill to be reauthorized this year.
"You hate to draw conclusions before studies are complete, but you've seen city after city that has used a light-rail link to spur development along the rail," Staton said.
The concept is a departure from the $85 million high-speed rail system between Lansing and Detroit that regional leaders studied for years. That project never left the station, partly because of the lack of federal transit subsidies available for startup in 2004 and 2005, officials said.
"We continue to look at it, but don't rule it out," said Carol Wood, a Lansing councilwoman and chairperson of the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission, referring to the high-speed rail project.
"The issue continues to be funding for these startups. The government sometimes hands out startup money, but that doesn't necessarily mean you have money to keep something running."
Wood, who is not a member of Task Force Tomorrow, said she was intrigued by light rail and would welcome any ideas the task force has to introduce it in the area.
Any proposal for a new transit system would likely go to the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission for review and approval; the body represents municipalities in Eaton, Clinton and Ingham counties and is the agency that presents transportation funding requests to the state and federal government.
Members of Task Force Tomorrow have not kicked around cost estimates for a light-rail system, but it wouldn't be cheap.
A proposed light-rail system in Grand Rapids would cost an estimated $78 million, according to a feasibility study done on the project.
Susan McGillicuddy, Meridian township supervisor, supported the idea of at least looking at a new community rail system.
"Anything we can do to make Lansing the exciting city it needs to be," McGillicuddy said.
Robert Garrett, an archivist with the Archives of Michigan, said it's ironic that Lansing is among many cities nationwide that may embrace light rail again now that gas prices are high and green energy is the new rave.
"The automobiles were coming, and the automobiles were going more places," Garrett said of when streetcars were abandoned in Lansing.
"People wanted (streetcars) replaced with buses. They didn't go down the middle of the street."
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Thursday, February 5, 2009
An open letter to MDOT.
Dear MDOT,We appreciate your efforts to dress up Lansing's freeway interchanges. We wholeheartedly agree that visitors to our fine city should be treated to attractive vistas as they approach the Capitol dome, and that strollers on their daily constitutionals along Larch and Cedar Streets deserve sights that regale the eyes and warm the heart with a swell of hometown pride.
We really are touched by your conscientious attention to our aesthetic sensibilities.
But, MDOT, we have just one little tiny concern. It's the benches.
Yes, MDOT, we know Lansing is a little light on entertainment options and just a tad lacking in rewarding public spaces. We know Lansing loves cars (they loved them so much, they bulldozed R.E. Olds' mansion to build this very freeway). We know it's all part of America's love affair with the automobile. (BTW, that's kind of kinky and weird, but whatever). But come on now, MDOT, does Lansing really love cars THIS much?
Yes, MDOT, we know freeways deserve contemplation and reflection. We know they are a monumental feat of civil engineering that invests billions of our hard-earned taxpayer dollars in the name of personal freedom and choice (i.e., the freedom to either drive a car or drop out of productive society). We know Lansing is landlocked, so we can't very well sit on the dock of the bay. And we know we can't go to the downtown movie theatres to have fun, because they've all been demolished.
It's just that...oh, MDOT...it's just that we're not quite sure our first pick of entertainment on a leisurely Sunday afternoon is to sit on one of your fucking benches and stare at an off-ramp.
But thanks for trying, MDOT. You get an "A" for effort. (A big scarlet one.)
Warm regards,
WTF Lansing.
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Introduction.
Greetings from Lansing, the capital city of Michigan.
This is a blog about the urban habitat of greater Lansing. It is a frank discussion of the visible, tangible infrastructure that meets, greets, and assaults the eyes of Lansingites, commuters, and visitors each and every day.
It fills a vacuum of sorts. The incredible shrinking Lansing State Journal, a zombie of the Gannett corporation, subsists on newswire boilerplate and passes off corporate press releases as news. Capital Gains has a refreshing perspective but only gives us the happy stories. The Lansing City Pulse offers some substantive journalism but covers a broad array of issues.
We recognize the value of the above. (Hey, even zombies are people too!) But WTF Lansing is a little different. We zero in on the urban habitat, the physical environment of the Lansing area. We expose the bad, highlight the good, and sweeten the delivery with humor and irony.
You may ask, "Why the urban habitat?"
The answer is that the urban habitat is the nest we live in. In Lansing and most of America, that nest has been fouled. Worse, too many people have come to accept this state of affairs as normal. The despotic reign of the automobile and of suburbanization yielded short-term benefits to Lansing but, in the long run, has not been kind to this once-fair city. The quality of our urban habitat has implications for how we get around, how safe we feel in our surroundings, how long (and how well) we live, and how well we retain existing residents and attract new ones. It influences how--and whether--we grow. It dictates our fate in an energy-scarce future. And on a more subtle level, it reflects on our pride in the places we call home.
You may ask, "I'm not from Lansing. Why should I care?"
The answer is that the depressing eyesores and boneheaded planning decisions of greater Lansing are a microcosm of the problems faced by midsized cities across America. Whenever we discuss a local issue, we'll put it in a broader perspective that applies to every city that has held itself hostage to the pervasive ugliness and unacceptable compromises of our automobile age. Wherever possible, we'll offer examples of how things could be done better--a wishlist for the future. And we'll also talk about things that are being done well here. There are a lot more of them these days, although not nearly enough--yet--to make up for the losses.
Finally, we'll try to make this fun. After all, a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down.
This is a blog about the urban habitat of greater Lansing. It is a frank discussion of the visible, tangible infrastructure that meets, greets, and assaults the eyes of Lansingites, commuters, and visitors each and every day.
It fills a vacuum of sorts. The incredible shrinking Lansing State Journal, a zombie of the Gannett corporation, subsists on newswire boilerplate and passes off corporate press releases as news. Capital Gains has a refreshing perspective but only gives us the happy stories. The Lansing City Pulse offers some substantive journalism but covers a broad array of issues.
We recognize the value of the above. (Hey, even zombies are people too!) But WTF Lansing is a little different. We zero in on the urban habitat, the physical environment of the Lansing area. We expose the bad, highlight the good, and sweeten the delivery with humor and irony.
You may ask, "Why the urban habitat?"
The answer is that the urban habitat is the nest we live in. In Lansing and most of America, that nest has been fouled. Worse, too many people have come to accept this state of affairs as normal. The despotic reign of the automobile and of suburbanization yielded short-term benefits to Lansing but, in the long run, has not been kind to this once-fair city. The quality of our urban habitat has implications for how we get around, how safe we feel in our surroundings, how long (and how well) we live, and how well we retain existing residents and attract new ones. It influences how--and whether--we grow. It dictates our fate in an energy-scarce future. And on a more subtle level, it reflects on our pride in the places we call home.
You may ask, "I'm not from Lansing. Why should I care?"
The answer is that the depressing eyesores and boneheaded planning decisions of greater Lansing are a microcosm of the problems faced by midsized cities across America. Whenever we discuss a local issue, we'll put it in a broader perspective that applies to every city that has held itself hostage to the pervasive ugliness and unacceptable compromises of our automobile age. Wherever possible, we'll offer examples of how things could be done better--a wishlist for the future. And we'll also talk about things that are being done well here. There are a lot more of them these days, although not nearly enough--yet--to make up for the losses.
Finally, we'll try to make this fun. After all, a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)